The Women Who Refused Confinement - an Editorial Review of "Abandoning the Script" by Linda Rosen
- DK Marley
- 14 minutes ago
- 6 min read

Book Blurb:
"Engaging and immersive, Rosen delivers a deeply moving plot with a heartfelt conclusion." -Rochelle Weinstein, bestselling author of We Are Made of Stars
Lucy never wanted the life that's been thrust upon her-the wedding band or the baby in the crib. A woman of ambition, she longs to pursue her dreams on stage, but her husband insists on locking her in a gilded cage under his control. And in 1922, alternatives are almost nonexistent and certainly not acceptable, forcing Lucy to make an impossible choice. Bound by convention but driven by a fierce desire for independence, she flees a life she can no longer endure. With heartbreak, she leaves a pair of cherished earrings along with a note for her daughter to read when she's older.
Nearly thirty years later, in 1951, Lucy's daughter, Anna Dodge, is given her deceased grandmother's journal that's been hidden away for years. Within its pages lies a long-buried secret, casting doubt on everything Anna believes about her family and herself. Among the clues is the story of the earrings, hinting at truths that defy what Anna has always known.
Devastated and determined to understand her past, Anna embarks on a journey to unmask the truth. As she does, she discovers the past isn't just something to uncover-it's something that could determine her future.
Book Buy Link: https://geni.us/iPUBK
Author Bio:

Fitness Professional turned novelist, Linda Rosen’s books are set in the “not-too-distant past” and examine how women reinvent themselves despite obstacles thrown their way. A central theme is that blood is not all that makes a family– and they always feature a piece of jewelry! Her novels are published by Black Rose Writing. Linda was a contributor to Women in the Literary Landscape: A WNBA Centennial Publication for the Women's National Book Association and to the anthology, Launch Pad: The Countdown to Writing Your Book. She is a member of the Women's Fiction Writers Association and co-founder of the South Florida chapter of the Women’s National Book Association where she holds the position of VP of Programming. She is a founding member of The Author Talk Network and an administrator and editor of the Facebook Group, Bookish Road Trip. Linda lives with her husband in New Jersey, but when the leaves fall and she has to swap sandals for shoes and socks, they move to their home in Florida.
Title: Abandoning the Script
Author: Linda Rosen
Rating: 4.5
Some departures fracture families while others fracture the stories those families tell about themselves. Linda Rosen’s “Abandoning the Script” begins with one such departure. At its heart, the novel examines women who refuse confinement, the painful toll exacted by freedom and the long-buried family truths that lie dormant for decades only to later emerge and reshape the lives of those who inherit them. Set against the rigid expectations of 1920s and 1950s America, the novel centers on Lucy Brandt, a talented actress whose longing for the stage collides with her roles as wife and mother. She makes the devastating decision to leave her husband and young daughter in order to reclaim her identity as an artist, a choice that in her era constitutes not merely personal rebellion but social transgression. A woman who stepped outside the boundaries of marriage and motherhood risked far more than scandal. She actually forfeited reputation, respectability, and often her very sense of self.
Early in the novel, Lucy sits in her mother-in-law’s kitchen, attempting to articulate the tension that has been steadily accumulating in her marriage.
“I know that idea is foreign to you and to many men. But there are women who do both. And we’re fortunate to have your mother here with us. Rosy adores her. And Grandmama loves Rosy more than anyone ever could.” He shoots up tall, plants his feet wide. “More than you?” “Oh, Charles, please, try to understand. I love our daughter and I want to be a good mother, but I’m afraid that’s not possible if I can’t be my true self.” I gather my courage and proceed. “Try to think of it this way. If you were forced to stay home, never to go to the hospital again or see any patients, wouldn’t you feel you lost yourself?”
This moment matters because it brings into focus the quiet asymmetry of Lucy’s marriage, where one life feels as though it is expanding while the other is gradually narrowing. The argument feels reasonable, measured and yet utterly futile, largely because Charles appears unwilling to fully see what Lucy is trying to articulate. The prose here is deliberately understated, there are no fireworks, no dramatic confrontation, just a woman carefully presenting a logical case to a man who seems to have already settled the matter in his mind. What makes this passage devastating is its restraint. Lucy is calm, articulate, and composed, qualities that quietly counter the dismissive labels women were frequently given when they dared to want more. She is simply asking for the same fulfillment her husband takes for granted. However, the argument that follows tells us everything about why she may eventually feel she has no choice but to leave. What Rosen captures here is not a dramatic rupture but the slow suffocation of being unseen. Lucy is not fleeing irresponsibility so much as resisting erasure and that distinction is what makes her departure feel tragic rather than selfish.
Years later, after Lucy has gone and after the family seems to have rewritten its history around her absence, her mother-in-law sits alone with a journal, writing words Lucy will never read.
“Although she has done the unthinkable – what woman leaves her daughter? – I must admit I understand Lucy. Maybe I am even a bit envious of her. Oh, no, not for leaving a child, but for following her dream, her convictions, and I am not angry. I still love her, yet I am filled with sorrow. For Rosy and for myself. I wish I could write her a letter, though that will never be. Charles has decreed we never speak her name or have any contact with her.”
This is the novel’s moral center, the place where judgment begins to soften into something more complicated and human. Mama Brandt occupies an impossible position, where she is suspended between loyalty to her son and a reluctant admiration for the woman he has erased but now seems to understand. The prose is quiet, almost confessional, and that restraint makes the admission feel earned rather than sentimental. There is no melodrama here, no grand pronouncements about right and wrong, only a woman in private telling the truth to paper because she cannot tell it anywhere else. The journal itself seems to function more than a record of events, like an act of quiet resistance. And in a household where Charles controls the official narrative of the past, ink becomes the only space where ambiguity is allowed to breathe.
Near the end, Anna, the daughter Lucy left behind decades earlier, sits in her grandmother’s bedroom holding the journal and letters that feel as though they are quietly undoing the story she has lived with.
“Reading the letter, I feel my pulse kick up. I fall back against the pillows, holding my chest, absorbing each word on the blue paper. Words I’ve been petrified to accept yet, in my heart, I knew were true. “I want my daughter to have something of mine, something she can wear that’ll connect us to each other.”My daughter! Oh my God. And the signature is Lucy’s.”
The power of this moment lies in its layering of revelation upon revelation. Anna is not simply learning that her mother is alive, rather, that her mother has been reaching toward her across decades. The realization feels destabilizing especially as it dawns on her that the earrings she wears are not merely jewelry but messages in bottles sent from a shore she never knew existed. The prose mirrors her emotional disorientation, with short sentences and exclamation points that feel less theatrical than involuntary, as though the realization is breaking over her before she can fully absorb it. This moment feels like what the novel has been building toward, not a meeting between mother and daughter but a moment when a daughter realizes she may have been loved all along in ways she was never permitted to see. Here, Rosen appears to suggest that abandonment is not solely physical absence but emotional severance and in redrawing that boundary, she quietly re-frames Lucy’s departure. She may have left, but she does not seem to have relinquished love, and that distinction subtly but profoundly reshapes the entire narrative.
Linda Rosen’s “Abandoning the Script” explores themes of female autonomy and the quiet costs exacted by convention with a kind of steady restraint that keeps it from ever feeling didactic. Lucy’s story could easily have become a polemic, but Rosen never lets her to harden into a symbol. We see her remain fully human, flawed and conflicted, loving her daughter and the theater, and finding that the world she inhabits gives her no room to choose between the two. The pacing moves gracefully between Lucy’s 1920s New York and Anna’s 1950s world, each timeline illuminating the other. What lingers is how the characters feel on the page, from Mama Brandt- Charles’s mother, a woman who appears to understand far more than she is able to say, to Florence, the stepmother who makes her own compromises and lives with them, Charles, who though infuriating as he is, and Rosen, who shows how ordinary convictions, sincerely held, can become instruments of harm. Read this book and you will understand why some questions have no easy answers, and why the hardest choices are sometimes the most loving ones.
To have your historical novel editorially reviewed and/or enter the HFC Book of the Year contest, please visit www.thehistoricalfictioncompany.com/book-awards/award-submission



